The Nonproliferation Review is a refereed journal concerned with the causes, consequences, and control of the spread of nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons. The Review features case studies, theoretical analyses, historical studies, reports, viewpoints, and book reviews on such issues as state-run weapons programs, treaties and export controls, safeguards, verification and compliance, disarmament, terrorism, and the economic and environmental effects of weapons proliferation.
Authors come from many regions and disciplines. With subscribers in 50 countries, the Review is an essential resource for policy makers and scholars worldwide.
To submit your manuscript, follow the submission guidelines and submit your article through our online Editorial Manager system.
The Journal
Read the Nonproliferation Review at Taylor & Francis Online.
Recent Online Features
- Nonproliferation Review Publishes First Special Issue on “Beyond Nuclear Deterrence”
The Nonproliferation Review features a special collection of articles by the Harvard–MacArthur Beyond Nuclear Deterrence Working Group. - Getting Beyond Nuclear Deterrence: A Research Agenda
Dr. Stephen Herzog and co-authors lay out research directions for thinking about a durable nuclear-weapons-free world. - The Inherent Unpredictability of Nuclear DeterrenceThis essay by Jeff Knopf is the lead article in a special issue of The Nonproliferation Review featuring papers from the Beyond Nuclear Deterrence working group.
- Article on Russian nuclear strategy during Ukraine war takes top McElvany AwardAn article providing key insights into Russian nuclear strategy during the first 18 months of the war in Ukraine has won the grand prize.
- Nonproliferation Review and CNS Announce McElvany Award WinnersGrand Prize winner: “A tale of two fuel cycles: defining enrichment and reprocessing in the nonproliferation regime” by Sidra Hamidi and Chantell Murphy.
- Re-emphasizing the Human Factor in Nuclear Security
Two experts explore the role of human factors in undermining nuclear security and suggest some ways to curb the risks. - Is nationalist populism creating new nuclear dangers?
Nuclear arsenals in the hands of nationalist-populist leaders might require a rethinking of assumptions about the global nuclear order.
Browse Past Issues
This section of the page is no longer being updated. Find articles from the Nonproliferation Review at Taylor & Francis Online.
By Issue
| Year | Issues | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 27.1/2 | |||
| 2019 | 26.1/2 | 26.3/4 | 26.5/6 | |
| 2018 | 25.1/2 | 25.3/4 | 25.5/6 | |
| 2017 | 24.1/2 | 24.3/4 | 24.5/6 | |
| 2016 | 23.1/2 | 23.3/4 | 23.5/6 | |
| 2015 | 22.1 | 22.2 | 22.3/4 | |
| 2014 | 21.1 | 21.2 | 21.3/4 | |
| March | July | November | ||
| 2013 | 20.1 | 20.2 | 20.3 | |
| 2012 | 19.1 | 19.2 | 19.3 | |
| 2011 | 18.1 | 18.2 | 18.3 | |
| 2010 | 17.1 | 17.2 | 17.3 | |
| 2009 | 16.1 | 16.2 | 16.3 | |
| 2008 | 15.1 | 15.2 | 15.3 | |
| 2007 | 14.1 | 14.2 | 14.3 | |
| 2006 | 13.1 | 13.2 | 13.3 | |
| 2005 | 12.1 | 12.2 | 12.3 | |
| Spring | Summer | Fall | ||
| 2004 | 11.1 | 11.2 | 11.3 | |
| 2003 | 10.1 | 10.2 | 10.3 | |
| 2002 | 9.1 | 9.2 | 9.3 | |
| 2001 | 8.1 | 8.2 | 8.3 | |
| 2000 | 7.1 | 7.2 | 7.3 | |
| Fall | Winter | Spring | Fall | |
| 1999 | 6.1 | 6.2 | 6.3 | 6.4 |
| 1998 | 5.1 | 5.2 | 5.3 | |
| 1997 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.3 | |
| 1996 | 3.1 | 3.2 | 3.3 | |
| 1995 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 2.3 | |
| 1994 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 | |
Statements of fact and opinion expressed in The Nonproliferation Review are the responsibility of the authors alone and do not imply the endorsement of the editors, the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies, or the Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey.
