As the war approaches Nato’s borders military officials on both sides will have to communicate closely.
History suggests the war in Ukraine could put an end to arms control as we know it.
![Nonproliferation Review NPR thumbnail for posts [[Evergreen]]](https://nonproliferation.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/generic_blank_npr-490x300.png)
Articles analyzing Russia’s long history of fabrications about biological weapons and Russia’s own BW history
A flurry of unsubstantiated and intentionally misleading allegations began prior to the Russian invasion of Ukraine and continue to this date.
So far, arms control has played its intended role of limiting the scope and violence in Ukraine.
Why have these civilian nuclear facilities been the object of attack, and what are the likely consequences of this high-risk military action by Moscow?
This paper provides an overview of changes taking place in relation to export controls, particularly from a US perspective.
Inertial confinement fusion (ICF) helps states with experience in nuclear testing to advance their weapons program without having to conduct further full-scale testing.
Russia’s ability to project power into the region remains limited today, and the status quo seems tolerable. But there are risks to U.S. interests in the future.
A new program of humanitarian aid will be needed to permit a safe reopening, and potentially also to address the human consequences of the protracted closure.
