A fundamental question raised by the agreement is whether it strengthens or weakens efforts to curb the spread of nuclear weapons.
The state of dismantlement efforts and recommendations.
Statement made to the United Nations General Assembly, September14, 2002, New York
Occasional Paper #8: A collection of papers examining the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in the United States, and analyzing U.S. and international responses to 9/11. They also propose measures to avert terrorism and to reduce mass-destruction threats to U.S. and international security.
Increased transparency measures are needed of both countries.
The research teams presented findings and recommendations on US nonproliferation programs that focus on regional facilities.
November 7, 2001 Jonathan Tucker Testimony by Jonathan B. Tucker, Ph.D. Director, Chemical & Biological Weapons Nonproliferation Program Center for Nonproliferation Studies Monterey Institute of International Studies Washington, D.C. Office before the Subcommittee on International Security, Proliferation, and Federal Services of the U.S. Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs November 7, 2001, 2:30 p.m. Room 342, […]
Do the World Trade Center and Pentagon bombings represent a major US intelligence failure? Reply prepared by Dr. Phillip Saunders, Director, East Asia Nonproliferation Program By definition these attacks represent an intelligence failure, because the intelligence and law enforcement communities did not provide advance warning that they were coming. That said, it is extremely difficult […]
Policymakers, non-governmental analysts, and journalists met for the workshop in Washington, DC.
Occasional Paper #4: Michael Barletta, ed.
